Sterling Employment Law
248-633-8916
  • Home
  • Attorneys
    • Brian J. Farrar
    • Edmund S. Aronowitz
    • James C. Baker
    • Katherine F. Cser
    • Jyarland Q. Daniels
    • Carol A. Laughbaum
    • Raymond J. Sterling
    • Jennifer L. Lord
    • Gerald (“Jerry”) D. Wahl (In Memoriam 1948 – 2024)
    • Noah Peltier
  • Practice Areas
    • Employment Law For Employees
    • Discrimination & Wrongful Discharge
    • Executive & C-Level Legal Services
    • Employment Contract Negotiation
    • Employment Law For Employers
  • Resources
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Careers
  • Contact Us
Sterling Employment Law
248-633-8916
  • Home
  • Attorneys
    • Brian J. Farrar
    • Edmund S. Aronowitz
    • James C. Baker
    • Katherine F. Cser
    • Jyarland Q. Daniels
    • Carol A. Laughbaum
    • Raymond J. Sterling
    • Jennifer L. Lord
    • Gerald (“Jerry”) D. Wahl (In Memoriam 1948 – 2024)
    • Noah Peltier
  • Practice Areas
    • Employment Law For Employees
    • Discrimination & Wrongful Discharge
    • Executive & C-Level Legal Services
    • Employment Contract Negotiation
    • Employment Law For Employers
  • Resources
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Careers
  • Contact Us

Strategic Employment Law Representation

Female Wal-Mart employees: Sexism in the workplace persists

On Behalf of Sterling Employment Law | Jan 24, 2012 | Employees' Rights

Detroit readers probably remember last year when the U.S. Supreme Court told female Wal-Mart employees who were complaining of sex discrimination that they could not bring a class action lawsuit against the discount giant because they did not share enough in common to be considered a “class.” The good news is these women have not given up in their quest to have their employee rights respected.

Lawyers who have worked with female Wal-Mart employees since then insist sexism is still rife at the Arkansas-based retailer’s stores. One attorney who has worked with several female Wal-Mart employees has said it seems to him that the company is being more “sensitive” to the issue of gender in the workplace, but still has not done enough to ensure that sex is not a factor in pay raises or promotions.

The women originally sued because they felt they were being paid less than their male counterparts who were doing equal or substantially similar jobs and were not being promoted as quickly as men would be. Wal-Mart has denied their claims and has said its corporate governance policy stresses inclusion, diversity and equality.

It will be interesting to see what, if anything, comes of this issue. As the country’s biggest employer, Wal-Mart has a responsibility not only to treat its female employees fairly and equally, but to set a standard for other retailers to follow, too. It is heartening to see that the women who feel they have been treated unequally are continuing undaunted.

Source: The Huffington Post, “Wal-Mart Faces Long Battle On Sex Discrimination, Despite Supreme Court Ruling,” Lila Shapiro, Jan. 24, 2012

Recent Posts

  • Employers: Think Twice Before Assuming Your Highly Paid Worker is Exempt from Overtime Pay
  • What are CIC agreements, and how can they affect executives?
  • Michigan’s new Earned Sick Time Act and its impact on pregnant employees
  • Michigan’s new Earned Sick Time Act: A guide for other caregivers
  • How Michigan’s new sick-time law applies to parents and caregivers

Categories

Archives

RSS Feed

Subscribe To This Blog's Feed

Results-Driven Employment Law Representation

Contact Us Today

Sterling Employment Law

Address

33 Bloomfield Hills Parkway
Suite 250
Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304

Bloomfield Hills Office

Telephone

248-633-8916
  • Follow
  • Follow
  • Follow

© 2026 Sterling Employment Law • All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw

Review The Firm