Sterling Employment Law
248-633-8916
  • Home
  • Attorneys
    • Brian J. Farrar
    • Edmund S. Aronowitz
    • James C. Baker
    • Katherine F. Cser
    • Jyarland Q. Daniels
    • Carol A. Laughbaum
    • Raymond J. Sterling
    • Jennifer L. Lord
    • Gerald (“Jerry”) D. Wahl (In Memoriam 1948 – 2024)
    • Noah Peltier
  • Practice Areas
    • Employment Law For Employees
    • Discrimination & Wrongful Discharge
    • Executive & C-Level Legal Services
    • Employment Contract Negotiation
    • Employment Law For Employers
  • Resources
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Careers
  • Contact Us
Sterling Employment Law
248-633-8916
  • Home
  • Attorneys
    • Brian J. Farrar
    • Edmund S. Aronowitz
    • James C. Baker
    • Katherine F. Cser
    • Jyarland Q. Daniels
    • Carol A. Laughbaum
    • Raymond J. Sterling
    • Jennifer L. Lord
    • Gerald (“Jerry”) D. Wahl (In Memoriam 1948 – 2024)
    • Noah Peltier
  • Practice Areas
    • Employment Law For Employees
    • Discrimination & Wrongful Discharge
    • Executive & C-Level Legal Services
    • Employment Contract Negotiation
    • Employment Law For Employers
  • Resources
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Careers
  • Contact Us

Strategic Employment Law Representation

New mom wins $148,000 after wrongful termination related to pregnancy

On Behalf of Sterling Employment Law | Mar 9, 2012 | Workplace Discrimination

Pregnant women have it a little harder than the rest of us. There’s morning sickness to contend with, to say nothing of all the other physical changes that come along with pregnancy. Furthermore, Michigan mothers will certainly tell you that carrying a baby to term makes just about everything that once was easy a lot harder. That’s why it is really too bad that there are still companies and businesses that think discrimination against pregnant women is okay.

Recently, a Milwaukee medical-staffing agency had to pay a $148,000 fine after the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission found that it discriminated against a woman who had just given birth to a child.

The agency said that HCS Medical Staffing Inc. violated employment laws because its employees made derogatory comments about the woman’s pregnancy and then dismissed her when she asked for the maternity leave to which she was entitled. Supposedly, the owner of the agency felt the woman was trying to use her pregnancy to con the company into giving her more time off. It supposedly fired her by sending a letter to the hospital where she was recovering after giving birth.

The $148,000 represents the pay the woman would have received, plus interest and punitive and compensatory damages.

Although this woman is certainly happy to have won, it’s a shame she had to go through all this rigmarole in the first place. Employment laws have put protections in place so that a pregnancy does not negatively impact a woman’s career and those laws need to be observed.

Source: The Pioneer Press, “Milwaukee company to pay $148K for firing new mom,” March 3, 2012

Recent Posts

  • Employers: Think Twice Before Assuming Your Highly Paid Worker is Exempt from Overtime Pay
  • What are CIC agreements, and how can they affect executives?
  • Michigan’s new Earned Sick Time Act and its impact on pregnant employees
  • Michigan’s new Earned Sick Time Act: A guide for other caregivers
  • How Michigan’s new sick-time law applies to parents and caregivers

Categories

Archives

RSS Feed

Subscribe To This Blog's Feed

Results-Driven Employment Law Representation

Contact Us Today

Sterling Employment Law

Address

33 Bloomfield Hills Parkway
Suite 250
Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304

Bloomfield Hills Office

Telephone

248-633-8916
  • Follow
  • Follow
  • Follow

© 2026 Sterling Employment Law • All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw

Review The Firm