Sterling Employment Law
248-633-8916
  • Home
  • Attorneys
    • Brian J. Farrar
    • Edmund S. Aronowitz
    • James C. Baker
    • Katherine F. Cser
    • Jyarland Q. Daniels
    • Carol A. Laughbaum
    • Raymond J. Sterling
    • Jennifer L. Lord
    • Gerald (“Jerry”) D. Wahl (In Memoriam 1948 – 2024)
    • Noah Peltier
  • Practice Areas
    • Employment Law For Employees
    • Discrimination & Wrongful Discharge
    • Executive & C-Level Legal Services
    • Employment Contract Negotiation
    • Employment Law For Employers
  • Resources
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Careers
  • Contact Us
Sterling Employment Law
248-633-8916
  • Home
  • Attorneys
    • Brian J. Farrar
    • Edmund S. Aronowitz
    • James C. Baker
    • Katherine F. Cser
    • Jyarland Q. Daniels
    • Carol A. Laughbaum
    • Raymond J. Sterling
    • Jennifer L. Lord
    • Gerald (“Jerry”) D. Wahl (In Memoriam 1948 – 2024)
    • Noah Peltier
  • Practice Areas
    • Employment Law For Employees
    • Discrimination & Wrongful Discharge
    • Executive & C-Level Legal Services
    • Employment Contract Negotiation
    • Employment Law For Employers
  • Resources
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Careers
  • Contact Us

Strategic Employment Law Representation

45 is the new 55 when it comes to age discrimination

On Behalf of Sterling Employment Law | Feb 15, 2022 | Age discrimination

Ask any American what the traditional age for retirement is in the United States and they will most likely answer “65.” However, during the past two decades, a new trend has emerged. First, it targeted the Baby Boomers, deeming those who are 55 years or older unfit to work. Now it has dropped another 10 years, targeting Gen-Xer’s who are 45 years old and up.

Despite the fact that people aged 45 and up may be fully capable of working at their job for another 20+ years, some companies see them as liabilities. All too often a person between the ages of 45-65 years old finds themselves on the receiving end of a pink slip. At the same time, a younger person is brought in to take the older person’s place. One thing is clear: if a person loses his job for no other reason than his age, it is likely that he is a victim of age discrimination.

Myths surrounding employees and age

Some of the inaccurate stereotypes and myths regarding age discrimination include;

  •       Older employees are stuck in the stone age. What they learned when they were new to the field no longer applies.
  •       Workers in their 40’s and up aren’t willing to learn. Technology is constantly evolving but older people don’t want to learn the new stuff.
  •       People in their 40’s and up are slow. Mentally and physically, Millenials are younger and quicker.

Lumping all employees into any and/or all of these stereotypes is wrong. Anyone who believes that they have been a victim of ageism in the workplace should seek legal guidance.

Recent Posts

  • Employers: Think Twice Before Assuming Your Highly Paid Worker is Exempt from Overtime Pay
  • What are CIC agreements, and how can they affect executives?
  • Michigan’s new Earned Sick Time Act and its impact on pregnant employees
  • Michigan’s new Earned Sick Time Act: A guide for other caregivers
  • How Michigan’s new sick-time law applies to parents and caregivers

Categories

Archives

RSS Feed

Subscribe To This Blog's Feed

Results-Driven Employment Law Representation

Contact Us Today

Sterling Employment Law

Address

33 Bloomfield Hills Parkway
Suite 250
Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304

Bloomfield Hills Office

Telephone

248-633-8916
  • Follow
  • Follow
  • Follow

© 2026 Sterling Employment Law • All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw

Review The Firm