Sterling Employment Law
248-633-8916
  • Home
  • Attorneys
    • Brian J. Farrar
    • Edmund S. Aronowitz
    • James C. Baker
    • Katherine F. Cser
    • Jyarland Q. Daniels
    • Carol A. Laughbaum
    • Raymond J. Sterling
    • Jennifer L. Lord
    • Gerald (“Jerry”) D. Wahl (In Memoriam 1948 – 2024)
    • Noah Peltier
  • Practice Areas
    • Employment Law For Employees
    • Discrimination & Wrongful Discharge
    • Executive & C-Level Legal Services
    • Employment Contract Negotiation
    • Employment Law For Employers
  • Resources
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Careers
  • Contact Us
Sterling Employment Law
248-633-8916
  • Home
  • Attorneys
    • Brian J. Farrar
    • Edmund S. Aronowitz
    • James C. Baker
    • Katherine F. Cser
    • Jyarland Q. Daniels
    • Carol A. Laughbaum
    • Raymond J. Sterling
    • Jennifer L. Lord
    • Gerald (“Jerry”) D. Wahl (In Memoriam 1948 – 2024)
    • Noah Peltier
  • Practice Areas
    • Employment Law For Employees
    • Discrimination & Wrongful Discharge
    • Executive & C-Level Legal Services
    • Employment Contract Negotiation
    • Employment Law For Employers
  • Resources
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Careers
  • Contact Us

Strategic Employment Law Representation

Financial consequences for thwarting Michigan’s ‘right-to-work’ law?

On Behalf of Sterling Employment Law | Mar 27, 2013 | Employment Contracts

Some Michigan Republicans are hot under the collar over maneuvers they believe are meant to thwart our state’s hot -button “right to work” law, which goes into effect Thursday.

Detroit readers will recall that law makes it illegal for unions to force people to pay dues. Supporters say it encourages worker autonomy, but detractors say it allows freeloaders (i.e. people who accept the benefits of union organization but don’t pay for them) and financially hamstrings unions.

Under the law, institutions can extend existing contracts, which effectively delays compliance. At least 46 workplaces that are home to powerful unions, such as Washtenaw County government and many school districts, did exactly that, pushing the expiration date of their existing contracts out several years.

Now, that is perfectly legal, but some Michigan Republicans see it as an attempt to follow the letter of the law while violating its spirit, and they are not happy.

Some of them are advocating for budget plans that cut funding for the institutions that extended their employment contracts. The penalties range from the tens of thousands of dollars all the way up to $47 million for the University of Michigan.

For now, it isn’t certain that these budget plans will make it very far. Senate Majority Leader Randy Richardville (R-Monroe) said he is very hesitant about any budget proposal that ties state appropriations to local decisions.

Even so, what is abundantly clear is that this law is still a politically controversial topic.

We took note of this story because employment contracts are among those matters with which we help clients.

Source: The Detroit Free Press, “School districts, universities skirt right-to-work at a hefty financial risk,” Kathleen Gray, March 27, 2013

  • For more information, you could visit the Employment Contracts section of our website.

Recent Posts

  • Employers: Think Twice Before Assuming Your Highly Paid Worker is Exempt from Overtime Pay
  • What are CIC agreements, and how can they affect executives?
  • Michigan’s new Earned Sick Time Act and its impact on pregnant employees
  • Michigan’s new Earned Sick Time Act: A guide for other caregivers
  • How Michigan’s new sick-time law applies to parents and caregivers

Categories

Archives

RSS Feed

Subscribe To This Blog's Feed

Results-Driven Employment Law Representation

Contact Us Today

Sterling Employment Law

Address

33 Bloomfield Hills Parkway
Suite 250
Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304

Bloomfield Hills Office

Telephone

248-633-8916
  • Follow
  • Follow
  • Follow

© 2026 Sterling Employment Law • All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw

Review The Firm